← All Conversations
June 25, 2026

I was using Claude completely wrong (and so are you)

Claude AI productivity Skills Projects Anthropic

Summary

We need to produce a summary 250-500 words, covering core insight, arguments, tools/techniques, actionable takeaways. No preamble, no labels. Just summary text. We need to ensure length between 250 and 500 words. Let's aim ~300-350 words. We must not include any preamble like "Here is a summary". Just output the summary. Let's craft. Key points: Using Claude like Google is wrong; Claude's deeper reasoning; models Haiku, Sonnet, Opus; extended thinking; free vs paid; desktop vs web; Projects; Skills; Connectors; actionable takeaways: use desktop, paid plan if >1hr/week, create Projects per work area, build or download Skills, enable extended thinking for complex tasks, use Connectors to integrate tools. Write in flowing paragraph(s). Ensure 250-500 words. Let's draft ~340 words. Check word count. I'll count roughly. Draft: "Many users initially treat Claude like a search engine, typing a question, reading a short answer, and moving on, which leads them to undervalue its capabilities. The real power of Claude lies in its design as a reasoning‑focused assistant created by former OpenAI researchers at Anthropic. Unlike ChatGPT, which excels at quick replies, and Gemini, which leans on Google integration, Claude delivers longer, more structured, and nuanced responses because it reads prompts carefully and seeks to understand the underlying need before answering. This makes it the preferred tool when the work matters and depth is required. Claude offers three model tiers: Haiku 4.5 for fast, simple tasks; Sonnet 4.6 as the balanced everyday choice; and Opus 4.7 for complex reasoning, deep analysis, and agentic work. Both Sonnet and Opus support an extended thinking mode that forces the model to reason further before responding, noticeably improving output quality. The free version provides only lighter model variants, hits usage limits quickly, and lacks the Cowork and Code modes that enable Claude to act on your system. A paid plan at $20 per month unlocks Opus, removes those limits, and grants access to those action‑oriented features, paying for itself with as little as one hour of weekly AI‑assisted work. For professional use, the desktop app is essential: it is faster, provides easier access to Skills, and is the only environment where Plugins function. The web version should be avoided for serious work. Two structural features transform how Claude is used. Projects act as persistent folders that store chats, uploaded files, and context; once set up, every conversation inside a Project begins with the full background loaded, eliminating repetitive re‑explaining. Users should create a separate Project for each major area of work—e.g., Instagram content, client research, product launches—to keep outputs focused. Skills are reusable instruction sets that teach Claude how to perform a specific task, much like hiring a specialist. They can be built with the internal Skill Creator or downloaded from community repositories such as skills.sh, then invoked with a slash command or auto‑selected. The more narrowly a Skill is defined, the better the result. Finally, Connectors let Claude read from and write to external tools like Google Drive, Notion, Slack, and Figma, or via MCP servers for services lacking native links (e.g., Google Ads). By combining the desktop app, a paid plan, Projects, Skills, and Connectors, users move from treating Claude as a fancy search bar to leveraging it as a coordinated AI team that handles complex, repetitive, and high‑stakes work efficiently." Now count words. Let's count manually approximate. I'll count each sentence words. Sentence1: "Many(1) users2 initially3 treat4 Claude5 like6 a7 search8 engine,9 typing10 a11 question,12 reading13 a14 short15 answer,16 and17 moving18 on,19 which20 leads21 them22 to23 undervalue24 its25 capabilities26." => 26 Sentence2: "The33 real34 power35 of36 Claude37 lies38 in39 its40 design41 as42 a43 reasoning‑focused44 assistant45 created46 by47 former48 OpenAI49 researchers50 at51 Anthropic52." => 20 (total 46) Sentence3: "Unlike53 ChatGPT,54 which55 excels56 at57 quick58 replies,59 and60 Gemini,61 which62 leans63 on64 Google65 integration,66 Claude67 delivers68 longer,69 more70 structured,71 and72 nuanced73 responses74 because75 it76 reads77 prompts78 carefully79 and80 seeks81 to82 understand83 the84 underlying85 need86 before87 answering88." => 23 (total 69) Sentence4: "This89 makes90 it91 the92 preferred93 tool94 when95 the96 work97 matters98 and99 depth100 is101 required102." => 13 (total 82) Sentence5: "Claude103 offers104 three105 model106 tiers:107 Haiku108 4.5109 for110 fast,111 simple112 tasks;113 Sonnet114 4.6115 as116 the117 balanced118 everyday119 choice;120 and121 Opus122 4.7123 for124 complex125 reasoning,126 deep127 analysis,128 and129 agentic130 work.131 Both132 Sonnet133 and134 Opus135 support136 an137 extended138 thinking139 mode140 that141 forces142 the143 model144 to145 reason146 further147 before148 responding,149 noticeably150 improving151 output152 quality153." => let's count: from Claude to quality. I'll count words: Claude(103

Hey

Let me tell you something I am embarrassed to admit.

For the first few weeks of using AI tools, I was using Claude exactly like I used Google.

Type a question. Read the answer. Close the tab.

And every time, I kept thinking — what is the big deal? ChatGPT does the same thing. Gemini does the same thing. Why does everyone say Claude is different?

Then I actually learned what Claude is and what it can do.

And now I cannot believe I wasted that time.

Today I am going to walk you through everything. From the basics that most beginners miss to the advanced features that are genuinely replacing entire teams. Beginner or not, there is something in this email for you.

What is Claude and why it is not just another chatbot

Claude is made by Anthropic, a company started by former OpenAI researchers. If ChatGPT is the one that everyone knows, Claude is the one that professionals quietly rely on.

The biggest difference is not features. It is how Claude thinks.

Claude gives longer, more structured, more nuanced responses. It does not try to be short for the sake of it. It reads your prompt carefully and actually tries to understand what you need before it responds. When you give it a complex task, it does not panic and give you a one-liner. It goes deep.

ChatGPT is good for quick answers. Gemini is good for Google integration. Claude is the one you want when the work actually matters.

#### **The three models and which one to use**

When you open Claude, you will see three model options.

Haiku 4.5 is the fastest. Good for quick, simple tasks where you do not need deep analysis.

Sonnet 4.6 is the everyday model. Best combination of speed and intelligence. This is what most people should be using most of the time.

Opus 4.7 is the most powerful. Built for complex reasoning, deep analysis, agentic tasks. It uses more of your token limit, so you do not want to waste it on simple requests. Use this when the task is genuinely complicated and quality is non-negotiable.

One more thing both Sonnet and Opus have **extended thinking** mode. Turn this on when you want Claude to reason through something more deeply before it responds. The difference in output quality is noticeable.

Free versus paid what you actually lose without it

The free version of Claude exists. It works. But you are missing three things that actually matter.

First, access to the more powerful models. Free gives you lighter versions. Paid gives you Opus.

Second, usability. The free version hits limits fast. If you are doing any serious work, you will run into the wall constantly.

Third, Cowork and Code. These are separate modes inside the paid version that let Claude take actions on your system. Free users do not get them at all.

The paid plan costs $20 per month. If you are doing even one hour of AI-assisted work per week, it pays for itself.

Web versus desktop — always use the desktop version

There is a web version and a desktop app. They look similar. They are not equal.

The desktop version is faster. It gives you easier access to Skills. And most importantly, it is the only place where Plugins work.

If you are using Claude for professional work, download the desktop app and stop using the browser version. There is no reason to handicap yourself.

Projects — the feature that changes how you work

Every time you open a new chat in Claude, it remembers nothing. Blank slate. You have to explain who you are, what you need, what format you want. Every single time.

Projects fix this.

A Project is basically a folder that holds your chats, your uploaded files, and your context. You set it up once. Every conversation inside that project starts with full context already loaded.

For example, if you are building a new course, create a Project for it. Upload your course outline, your SOPs, your reference documents. Now every chat inside that project already knows your entire course structure. No re-explaining. No starting from scratch.

One Project per major area of work. Instagram content gets one project. Client research gets another. New product launch gets its own. Keep them separate and your outputs stay focused.

### **Skills — this is where Claude becomes something else entirely**

This is the feature that most beginners completely miss. And it is the one that matters the most.

Think of it like building a team.

In a real marketing agency, you have different people for different jobs. One person does keyword research. One writes ad copy. One handles competitor analysis. Each one has their own expertise, their own way of working.

Claude Skills work the same way.

A Skill is a folder you build with instructions for a specific task. You define how the task should be done, what format to use, what to prioritize, what to avoid. You upload it to Claude once. From that point on, every time you need that task done, Claude already knows exactly how to do it.

No re-prompting. No explaining. Just results.

You can build Skills yourself using the Skill Creator that is already inside Claude. Or you can go to [skills.sh](https://skills.sh) and download Skills that people have already built — SEO audits, keyword research, ad copy, competitor analysis, and dozens more.

To activate a Skill in chat, type a forward slash. Your active Skills appear. Select one and go. Or do not select anything. Claude will read your prompt and pick the right Skill automatically.

The more specific your Skill, the better your output. One Skill, one job.

Connectors — how Claude talks to your other tools

Claude is useful by itself. It becomes powerful when it is connected to the tools you are already using.

Connectors let Claude read from and write to external platforms. Google Drive, Notion, Slack, Figma — these all have connectors you can activate inside Claude settings.

If a direct connector does not exist for the tool you need, you can still connect it using an MCP server. Google Ads, for example, has an official MCP server. Connect it, and Claude can pull your campaign data, analyze it, and help you act on it.

The third route is Zapier. If you want to connect Claude to a tool without writing any code, Zapier acts as the middleman. Connect through Zapier, and Claude can push and pull data from hundreds of platforms.

This is where the agentic stuff people keep talking about actually lives. Skills plus Connectors equals Claude working on your behalf.

Cowork — Claude taking action, not just giving answers

Most people use Claude in a loop. Ask a question. Get an answer. Go do the thing yourself.

Cowork breaks that loop.

Cowork gives Claude access to your system so it can actually do the work for you. It uses your Skills and Connectors to take actions on your behalf. Create files. Pull data. Move information between tools. Run tasks automatically.

If you want Claude to just answer you, use Chat. If you want Claude to actually do something, use Cowork.

This is the part people mean when they say they replaced parts of their team with AI. Not the chatting. The doing.

Artifacts — for when you need something you can actually use

Artifacts is where Claude builds things you can deploy directly.

Landing pages, apps, dashboards, quiz tools, templates, documents — if you want a visual output that you can publish or share or hand off, Artifacts is where you build it.

You answer a few questions about what you need, and Claude builds it live. You get a link you can share or publish directly. No developer needed for basic builds.

This is not just a content feature. For marketers, it means you can go from idea to working prototype in one session.

Plugins — the shortcut to everything

Plugins are pre-built bundles that come with Skills and Connectors already packaged together.

Instead of building out your Skills and Connectors one by one, you install a Plugin and get the whole setup at once. The Engineering plugin comes with about 10 Skills. The Design plugin comes with 7 Skills and 9 Connectors — Figma, Notion, Slack, Google Calendar, all connected.

Browse available Plugins inside Claude settings. If there is one that covers your area of work, install it first before building anything custom.

The one thing most people get wrong about prompting

Claude is more capable than most people realize. But capability only converts into results when you prompt well.

Here is the simplest upgrade you can make.

Stop using short prompts. A one-line prompt gets a one-line answer. A detailed prompt that explains the task, the context, the format you want, and any constraints you have — that gets you an actual output.

The best move is to ask Claude to write the prompt for you. Type a rough description of what you need. Ask Claude to generate a detailed prompt for that task. Then use that prompt going forward. That is your template.

And always keep web search turned on. Claude can access live web data when it needs to. If that is turned off, you are cutting off a major part of its capability.

Stay curious, talk to you tomorrow.

#### Finally…

Most people open Claude, type a question, get an okay answer, and move on.

That is not using Claude. That is wasting it.

The real version of Claude - the one that professionals are using to replace workflows and entire task categories - is built on Projects, Skills, Connectors, and Cowork. Not prompts alone.

If you are only using the chat window, you are using maybe 20% of what this tool can actually do.

The good news is that none of this is complicated. It just requires learning it once.

Start with one thing. Set up one Project. Install one Skill. See what happens to the quality of your output.

I promise it will not look like what you have been getting.