← All Conversations
June 28, 2026

I wasted a year learning AI wrong

AI learning context over prompts AI systems productivity Claude

Summary

We need to produce a summary 250-500 words, covering core insight, arguments, tools/techniques, actionable takeaways. No preamble, no labels. Just the summary text. We must ensure length between 250 and 500 words. Let's aim ~340 words. We need to capture the article: wasted time, focusing on picking one model, feeding context, building AI system. Provide actionable steps. Let's craft ~340 words. Check word count. We'll count roughly. Draft: "When I began learning AI I spent almost a year consuming endless tutorials, saving prompt PDFs and hopping between ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, yet I built no real skill. The breakthrough came when I asked what 20 % of AI knowledge will still matter a decade from now and built a three‑level roadmap that avoids fluff and expires quickly. Level 1 – Pick one model and go deep. Trying to master every tool spreads effort thin; today’s leading models are so similar that learning one transfers to the others. Choose based on three principles: use a paid tier because free versions are severely limited; match the model to your work—ChatGPT for research and web search, Claude for writing, design and coding, Gemini for multimodal tasks or Google Workspace integration; and pick the one whose “vibe” you enjoy, since enjoyment drives usage. A critical habit is to manually select the most powerful model available instead of accepting the platform’s default, which is deliberately the weakest to save compute cost. This single change yields noticeably better reasoning and nuance capture. Level 2 – Stop prompting, start feeding context. Prompt formulas are fragile; the real leverage is providing the AI with relevant background information. The OC principle—Outcome plus Context—means stating the desired result and supplying the material the AI can infer from. Practical ways to feed context include naming a known framework (e.g., “rewrite using the pyramid principle”), showing exemplars of good output, and connecting live data sources such as email, Drive, Slack or Notion so the AI pulls what it needs directly. Save this setup in a Project (Claude/ChatGPT) or Gem (Gemini); use markdown files for knowledge bases because they are cheaper and easier for the model to parse than PDFs. Level 3 – Connect everything into an AI system. Projects are silos; an integrated system lets the AI cross‑reference information across domains—health, supplements, workouts, etc.—producing insights that isolated projects cannot. Building such a system involves linking your Projects via shared knowledge bases, enabling the AI to draw connections and generate holistic recommendations. Actionable takeaways: 1) Commit to a single paid AI model aligned with your role; 2) Replace prompt crafting with context feeding using the OC principle and live data connections; 3) Organize recurring work in Projects/Gems with markdown knowledge; 4) Gradually fuse these Projects into a unified AI system to unlock cross‑domain intelligence." Now count words. Let's count quickly. "When(1) I2 began3 learning4 AI5 I6 spent7 almost8 a9 year10 consuming11 endless12 tutorials,13 saving14 prompt15 PDFs16 and17 hopping18 between19 ChatGPT,20 Claude21 and22 Gemini,23 yet24 I25 built26 no27 real28 skill.29 The30 breakthrough31 came32 when33 I34 asked35 what36 20 %37 of38 AI39 knowledge40 will41 still42 matter43 a44 decade45 from46 now47 and48 built49 a50 three‑level51 roadmap52 that53 avoids54 fluff55 and56 expires57 quickly. Level1 –58 Pick59 one60 model61 and62 go63 deep.64 Trying65 to66 master67 every68 tool69 spreads70 effort71 thin;72 today’s73 leading74 models75 are76 so77 similar78 that79 learning80 one81 transfers82 to83 the84 others.85 Choose86 based87 on88 three89 principles:90 use91 a92 paid93 tier94 because95 free96 versions97 are98 severely99 limited;100 match101 the102 model103 to104 your105 work—ChatGPT106 for107 research108 and109 web110 search,111 Claude112 for113 writing,114 design115 and116 coding,117 Gemini118 for119 multimodal120 tasks121 or122 Google123 Workspace124 integration;125 and126 pick127 the128 one129 whose130 “vibe”131 you132 enjoy,133 since134 enjoyment135 drives136 usage.137 A138 critical139 habit140 is141 to142 manually143 select144 the145 most146 powerful147 model148 available149 instead150 of151 accepting152 the153 platform’s154 default,155 which156 is157 deliberately158 the159 weakest160 to161 save162 compute163 cost.164 This165 single166 change167 yields168 noticeably169 better170 reasoning171 and172 nuance173 capture. Level2 –174 Stop175 prompting,176 start177 feeding178 context.179 Prompt180 formulas181 are182 fragile;183 the184 real185 leverage186 is187 providing188 the189 AI190 with191 relevant192 background193 information.194 The195 OC196 principle—Outcome197 plus198 Context—means199 stating20

Hey

I have a real confession.

When I started learning AI, I wasted close to 8 months doing it completely wrong.

I bookmarked 50 YouTube videos. I saved threads about "secret prompts." I downloaded prompt PDFs I never opened. I jumped between ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and every shiny new tool that launched that week.

I felt busy. I felt informed.

I was neither.

Because here is what nobody told me: most AI content out there is either outdated within months or pure theory you will never actually use. I was collecting information, not building skill.

The turning point came when I stopped asking "what should I learn next" and started asking "what 20% of this will still matter a decade from now."

That question changed everything. And today, I am giving you the answer.

If I had to learn AI from scratch in 2026, this is the exact roadmap I would follow. Three levels. Each one builds on the last. No fluff, no theory, nothing that expires next month.

#### **Level 1: Pick One Model and Go Deep**

This is where I made my first big mistake. I tried to learn every AI tool at once.

Do not do that.

Here is why one is enough. The top models used to be far apart in capability. Today they are clustered so close together that the difference for the average user is negligible. And because every AI company copies every other AI company, they all share the same core features. Projects, memory, file uploads, connectors. Learn them once, and the skill carries straight over to the rest.

So which one do you pick? Realistically, you have three serious choices: ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini.

Use these three principles to decide:

Principle 1: Prioritize paid tiers. If you are on free ChatGPT but your job gives you paid Gemini, go deep on Gemini. The gap between free and paid is night and day. Do not learn AI on the weakest version of it.

Principle 2: Match the AI to your work. ChatGPT is the most mature, has the most tutorials, and is excellent at web search and research. Claude is the strongest at writing, design, and coding, and coding matters even if you are not technical because data analysis and diagrams all run on code under the hood. Gemini is the pick if you work across text, images, audio, and video, or if you live inside Google Workspace.

Principle 3: Vibes. I know it sounds unserious. It is not. Each AI has its own personality, and the more you enjoy using yours, the more you will use it, and the better you will get. Switching later is easy anyway. All three now have memory import features.

One more thing, and this single tip is worth the whole email.

Change your default model. Every AI company defaults you to their weakest model because it is the cheapest for them to run. For any real work, manually select the most powerful model you have access to. The difference is not small. The powerful models break down your request, map out steps, and catch nuances you never thought to mention.

I used the default model for months without knowing this. Do not repeat my mistake.

#### **Level 2: Stop Prompting. Start Feeding Context.**

Notice I have not mentioned prompting frameworks yet. That is on purpose.

For my first few months, I memorized prompt formulas like exam answers. Role, task, format, tone. I treated prompting like a magic spell.

Then I realized something that made all those saved prompt PDFs useless.

The right context beats the perfect prompt. Every single time.

Here is a simple example. Say you need to find a restaurant for your boss. You could spend 10 minutes writing a detailed prompt describing everything you think your boss likes. Or you could paste a list of restaurants your boss has loved in the past and let the AI figure out the pattern.

The second approach wins every time. The list is context. Context carries information you would never think to write out.

So forget the 50 frameworks. There is only one worth remembering: **OC. Outcome plus Context.**

Tell the AI what you want. Give it the material to work from. It infers the rest, often better than you would have specified it yourself.

Three ways to feed it the right context:

1. Name a framework instead of explaining it. Saying "rewrite this using the pyramid principle" carries more context than a full paragraph describing what you want. Do not know the right framework? Ask the AI for options first, then pick one.

2. Show real examples of what good looks like. Instead of describing the format and tone for a weekly update, paste the last 2 or 3 updates that got approved, add your raw notes, and say "write this week's update in the same format." Examples contain everything you forget to say.

3. Connect your tools. Your best context already lives in your email, your Drive, your Slack, your Notion. Connect them, and the AI pulls what it needs directly. No more downloading and re-uploading files like it is 2023.

And then save all of it.

This is what **Projects** are for (Claude and ChatGPT call them Projects, Gemini calls them Gems). A Project is a permanent home for recurring work. Your instructions, your reference files, your examples, all saved once. Every new conversation inside it already knows your setup. You stop repeating yourself forever.

Quick pro tip: use markdown (.md) files in your Project knowledge instead of PDFs whenever possible. They are easier for the AI to read and cheaper to process. You can even ask the AI to convert your PDFs into markdown.

#### **Level 3: Connect Everything Into an AI System**

This is the level most people have not reached yet. Honestly, I only got here recently myself.

Here is the problem with Projects: each one is a silo. My workout Project cannot see what is inside my health checkup Project, even though it obviously should.

An AI system fixes that. It does two things Projects cannot:

First, it connects the dots across everything. When I migrated my separate health, supplements, and workout Projects into one system, the AI cross-referenced my latest checkup with my training plan, flagged that I had zero cardio days despite borderline high cholesterol, and recommended adding cardio to my rest days. No single Project could have caught that.

Second, it learns from your feedback and compounds. My favorite move is called "reconcile." The AI drafts something, I edit it heavily, then I say "reconcile my final version with your initial draft." It dissects every change I made and saves the rules for next time. The more feedback I give, the fewer instructions I need. The system literally gets smarter the longer I use it.

Your three options for building one, from easiest to most powerful:

Gemini Spark is the most beginner friendly. It is already connected to Gmail, Calendar, and Drive, so setup is minimal. The tradeoff is less control.

Claude Cowork is built specifically for non-technical people. More control than Spark, with a small amount of setup. This is the sweet spot for most readers of this newsletter.

Claude Code and OpenAI Codex are Cowork on steroids. Fully customizable and extremely powerful, but you need to be somewhat comfortable around code.

A funny tell for which one fits you: look at the model selector. Codex gives you a dozen intimidating options. Cowork gives you a few. Spark gives you none. Pick the one that matches your comfort level and grow from there.

#### **The Recap and My final thoughts…**

Level 1: Pick one of the big three. Use the paid tier if you can. Always select the most powerful model. Go deep, the skills transfer.

Level 2: Stop memorizing prompts. Outcome plus context wins. Save your recurring context in Projects so you never repeat yourself.

Level 3: Connect your Projects into one AI system that spots patterns across your life and compounds every time you give it feedback.

Most people are not at level 3 yet. Honestly, most people are barely at level 1. And that is fine. There is no rush.

But here is the thing I wish I understood 8 months earlier: the gap between using AI and using AI well is invisible. You cannot see it on anyone's screen. You only see it in their results.

Now you know exactly where you stand and what comes next.

Stay curious, talk to you tomorrow.